Say It Loud! Say No!
Current Campaign:

Enforce Article 55 & Stop IHR Amendments in WHA77! LEGAL NOTICE OF LIABILITY & LAWSUIT IF ADOPTED

URGENT Dispute must be settled according to WHA rules of procedure

URGENT Critical legal rebuttal RE: Clear WHO misinterpretation of the spirit of IHR 55(1)(2) and notice of responsibility for reparations if WHO & Member States continue the vote under Agenda Item 13.3 This is a dispute of a private nature under WHA rules of procedure for private disputes, regarding Agenda Item 13.3 Amendments to the IHR. The WHO is responsible and \"shall\" settle this URGENT dispute. Provisions of Article 55 of the IHR, which sets out to whom can propose amendments to the IHR, and when and how such proposals must be communicated to States Parties, have absolutely not been met by the WHO Secretariat.

Article 55(1) of the IHR enables any State Party or the WHO Director-General to propose amendments to the IHR for consideration by the World Health Assembly. This has been applied to the WGIHR process, which is not in dispute.

The WHO is acting in bad faith insofar as the attempt to ask Member States to continue WGIHR negotiations on the proposed amendments. This bad faith by WHO is shown in the OMISSION of the KEY text in IHR 55(2), when WHO makes the following misguided argument, which could only be true if the KEY text is omitted, which is precisely what WHO did, omit the main part in order to make a false argument, a crime called fraud of law in many Member States. WHO falsely claims: “Article 55(2) of the IHR further provides that the WHO Director-General shall communicate any proposed amendment to all States Parties at least four months before the World Health Assembly for consideration. This applies to any proposed IHR amendment submitted by a State Party or the WHO Director-General pursuant to Article 55(1).” 

The reason WHO is acting in bad faith to continue is they are knowingly attempting to violate their own IHR procedural limits. The Article 55(2) intent is very clear, so WHO took out the main part in bad faith in order to rebut the thousands of petitions asking to enforce Article 55 and stop the IHR Amendments at WHA77 for being late. Article 55(2) states unequivocally that the TEXT of any proposed amendment (meaning the actual TEXT of all 300+ amendments for due process to review the CONTENT). Verbatim Article 55(2) is as follows: “THE TEXT of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.” (CAP, italics & Bold added for emphasis)

In comparison, we can easily see the WHO OMITS the verbiage “THE TEXT of”, in order to purport “that the WHO Director-General shall communicate any proposed amendment to all States Parties at least four months before the World Health Assembly for consideration.

WHO added in the following line as an opinion which we dispute based on the text of IHR 55(2). “This applies to any proposed IHR amendment submitted by a State Party or the WHO Director-General pursuant to Article 55(1).”

It is not true that the WHO Director-General shall communicate any proposed amendment to all States Parties at least four months before the World Health Assembly for consideration. This applies to any proposed IHR amendment submitted by a State Party or the WHO Director-General pursuant to Article 55(1).”

The reason this is false is that in multilateral negotiations there are stages of the negotiation, and possible procedures attached to delineate the different stages. Under Article 55 we can see that the process is broken into a pre-negotiation stage of deciding the topics titles, which is all that can be accomplished under Article 55(1), the Amendments could be merely proposed, and listed for future text to be defined and agreed upon, and eventually voted upon in the WHA.

Under Article 55(2) we can clearly see that the proposed amendments mentioned in Article 55(1), which were preliminary proposals have now become applied to the next stage of the negotiation, where actual text is defined, agreed upon and finalized for the States to review at minimum 4 months prior to the WHA. It bears repeating that verbatim Article 55(2) is as follows: “THE TEXT of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.” (CAP, italics & Bold added for emphasis)

Based on the foregoing arguments, which are very clearly laid out in the full text of IHR Article 55, our organizations firmly refute the following false claim by World Health Organization: “In fulfilling the Article 55(2) requirement, the WHO Secretariat circulated all proposals for amendments to the IHR on 16 November 2022, some 17 months before the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly, which begins on 27 May 2024, when they are proposed for consideration. The World Health Assembly established the WGIHR, which operates as a subdivision of the Assembly and includes all 196 States Parties. As such, the WHO Secretariat has further exceeded the technical requirements of Article 55(2) by communicating not only the original 308 amendments, but also by communicating all proposed changes to these amendments developed by the WGIHR drafting group, to all 196 States Parties, after each WGIHR meeting. These communications to all States Parties occurred at the conclusion of each WGHIR meeting. In sum, both the letter and the spirit of Article 55(2) have been met. The letter of the provision was fulfilled, again, by the communication of 16 November 2022. This was well in advance of the four-month requirement. This notice maximized the time available for all States Parties for domestic and international consideration and coordination. The spirit of the provision, which is to ensure that all States Parties have adequate time to consider and coordinate domestically and internationally on the proposed amendments in the run up to the Assembly, has been met. 

We stand firm in our contention that the WHO is acting in bad faith, omitting parts of the IHR 55 in order to push through 300+ Amendments in a way that actually violates the full text of the IHR 55(2). No one OMITS the KEY part of a rule, unless they are trying to break that same rule in bad faith, which is fraud of law. This is precisely why the IHR Amendments must not be adopted and the WHO must be reviewed.  In the event that the IHR amendments are adopted, please be advised that all member states and the world health organization involved in the violation of the IHR procedural rules will be held responsible, and adopted amendments will be void and properly nullified. Sincerely,

Interest of Justice

Free Speech Association

Legal Authority:

Article 55 Amendments

  1. Amendments to these Regulations may be proposed by any State Party or by the Director- General. Such proposals for amendments shall be submitted to the Health Assembly for its consideration.

  2. The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.

  3. Amendments to these Regulations adopted by the Health Assembly pursuant to this Article shall come into force for all States Parties on the same terms, and subject to the same rights and obligations, as provided for in Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO and Articles 59 to 64 of these Regulations.

%%your signature%%

511 signatures

Share this with your friends:

Latest Signatures
511
Mr. Jay D.
May 28, 2024
510
Anonymous
May 28, 2024
509
Ms. Judith S.
May 28, 2024
508
Ms. Shamika G.
May 28, 2024
507
Anonymous
May 28, 2024
506
Ms. Cheryl R.
May 28, 2024
505
Ms. Cheryl A.
May 28, 2024
504
Ms. Loulou B.
May 28, 2024
503
Mr. Andreas N.
May 28, 2024
502
Mr. Petr F.
May 28, 2024
501
Anonymous
May 28, 2024
500
Mr. Vladimir N.
May 28, 2024
499
Ms. Sanja M.
May 28, 2024
498
Ms. Janice K.
May 28, 2024
497
Anonymous
May 28, 2024
496
Anonymous
May 28, 2024
495
Ms. Louise C.
May 28, 2024
494
Mrs. Kim S.
May 27, 2024
493
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
492
Ms. Jamey H.
May 27, 2024
491
Mrs. sophia r.
May 27, 2024
490
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
489
Ms. Sara T.
May 27, 2024
488
Mr. Don C.
May 27, 2024
487
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
486
Mr. Radu B.
May 27, 2024
485
Mr. Jim J.
May 27, 2024
484
Mr. Adam W.
May 27, 2024
483
Ms. Kim G.
May 27, 2024
482
Ms. Charlotte D.
May 27, 2024
481
Ms. Beatrice W.
May 27, 2024
480
Mrs. Priscilla J.
May 27, 2024
479
Ms. Vivian N.
May 27, 2024
478
Ms. Linda M.
May 27, 2024
477
Ms. Sarah R.
May 27, 2024
476
Ms. patricia b.
May 27, 2024
475
Ms. Sally L.
May 27, 2024
474
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
473
Ms. Pierre S.
May 27, 2024
472
Mr. James C.
May 27, 2024
471
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
470
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
469
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
468
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
467
Ms. Birgit L.
May 27, 2024
466
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
465
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
464
Ms. Claudia U.
May 27, 2024
463
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
462
Mrs. Debbie F.
May 27, 2024

Enforce Article 55 & Stop IHR Amendments in WHA77! LEGAL NOTICE OF LIABILITY & LAWSUIT IF ADOPTED

Use your voice to speak up and say no more UN and WHO funding for unproven agendas and monopolistic strategies and One Health concepts.

 

Stop 2022 IHR Amendments For Violating The Rules!

Greetings, This is a global demand

First Issue: Motion for Advisory Opinion from HHS OGA Legal Council and OIG:

URGENT request for response prior to WHA77.

Dear Legal Advisor,

On May 27, 2022, Committee A of the World Health Assembly “purportedly adopted” the amendments to the International Health Regulations.

CLICK HERE to watch the “purported adoption” of the amendments

It is our understanding through watching the video, that the meeting was very sparsely attended. As you know, Rule 85 (page 194 of the Basic Documents) clearly states that a majority of the members of the Committee are required to be present for a question to be put to a vote.

Due to the seeming lack of attendance when the vote was confirmed, and due to the fact there does not seem to be any record of attendance being taken just prior to the “purported adoption” of the amendments by Committee A on May 27, 2022, we are acting prudently and hereby assert our right to require proof from the Member States and WHO that the President of Committee A of the World Health Assembly has actually complied with Rule 85.

That request for proof was sent to The WHO:

Since the attendance by a majority of the members of Committee A was not confirmed, it seems the question regarding the proposed amendments could not be put to a valid vote within the guidelines detailed in Rule 85.

Question: Are the IHR Amendments adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022, valid and in compliance with every single rule that applies?

Question: If not, what is the proper remedy to suspend and annul the void act of the IHR Amendments adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022, in excess of the rules of procedure?

Question: If the IHR Amendment\'s adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022 were void ab initio, is there a violation of WHO Rules and if so, precisely which rules, who violated those rules, are there penalties that apply to the           violators, or is there any responsibility of cessation and reparations by WHO or MS to those parties who had to legally act to prove the void nature of the IHR Amendment\'s adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022?  Second set of Issues: After Committee A approved the amendments on May 27, 2022, it seems that during the Eighth Plenary meeting the next day, the members of the World Health Assembly COMPLETELY FAILED TO CONDUCT ANY VOTE AT ALL regarding the amendments to the International Health Regulations.

As far as we are aware it appears the following document was never voted on at all during the Eighth Plenary Session of he 75th World Health Assembly: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_R12-en.pdf

A review of the eighth Plenary session in the video record of the events of 28 May 2022 appears to show that NO OFFICIAL VOTE ON THIS MATTER WAS CONDUCTED AT ALL.

Question: Did the vote May 28, 2022 conform to the procedural rules as set forth in Rule 73, \"The Health Assembly shall normally vote by show of hands...\"?

Question: If not, what is the proper remedy to suspend and annul the void act of the IHR Amendments adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022, in excess of the rules of procedure, that were never fully voted upon as reqiured under Article 73?

Question: Did WHO violate their own rules by allowing new amendments to be submitted after the Article 55 deadline of 4 months in advance of the 2022 World Health Assembly?  https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_ACONF7-en.pdf

Question: Did WHO also violate their own rules by improperly \"voting\" on the amendments in Committee A on May 27, 2022 without a majority of members in attendance and without a show of hands. If so, Did WHO commit voting fraud in regards to the 2022 amendments? If so, what is the remedy?

Question: Did WHO violate their own rules by completely failing to vote on the amendments at all during the 8th Plenary session? https://www.who.int/about/accountability/governance/world-health-assembly/seventy-fifth-world-health-assembly

Question: Did WHO\'s LEGAL COUNSEL Derek Walton misrepresent this document as a \"CERTIFIED TRUE COPY\", despite the reality of no vote by the rules?https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_R12-en.pdf

Question: Was the submission of the above document on May 24, 2022 illegitimate, because it is a new amendment that is NOT technical in nature? see: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_ACONF7-en.pdf  It seems the 2022 amendment to Article 62 CREATED A NEW AUTHORITY for member nations to submit a reservation to an amendment, is this correct? If so, is this a NEW AUTHORITY that did not exist in the 2005 version of the IHR and is it legitimate or absolutely null and void?

Our premise, presumptions and assumptions - why we need to get to the truth about WHO:

The WHO violated their own rules by allowing new amendments to be submitted after the Article 55 deadline of 4 months in advance of the 2022 World Health Assembly.  https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_ACONF7-en.pdf

The WHO doubly violated their own rules by improperly \"voting\" on the amendments in Committee A on May 27, 2022 without a majority of members in attendance and without a show of hands. The WHO has clearly committed voting fraud in regards to the 2022 amendments.

The WHO violated their own rules by completely failing to vote on the amendments at all during the 8th Plenary session. https://www.who.int/about/accountability/governance/world-health-assembly/seventy-fifth-world-health-assembly

The WHO\'s LEGAL COUNSEL Derek Walton misrepresented this document as a \"CERTIFIED TRUE COPY\" https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_R12-en.pdf

The WGIHR is openly plotting to again violate the Article 55 requirement to submit amendments 4 months in advance of the 77th World Health Assembly.

Please Answer point by Point in chronological order

%%your signature%%

696 signatures

Share this with your friends:

Latest Signatures
696
Dr. Karen K.
May 28, 2024
695
Mrs. Karen O.
May 27, 2024
694
Mr. Randolph A.
May 27, 2024
693
Anonymous
May 27, 2024
692
Ms. Darlla G.
May 26, 2024
691
Ms. Diana B.
May 26, 2024
690
Anonymous
May 26, 2024
689
Mr. Jason W.
May 25, 2024
688
Anonymous
May 23, 2024
687
Ms. Shirley P.
May 23, 2024
686
Mr. Markku H.
May 23, 2024
685
Mrs. Sally N.
May 22, 2024
684
Anonymous
May 22, 2024
683
Anonymous
May 21, 2024
682
Ms. Sandi W.
May 21, 2024
681
Anonymous
May 21, 2024
680
Ms. Elizabeth H.
May 21, 2024
679
Anonymous
May 21, 2024
678
Anonymous
May 21, 2024
677
Ms. Elizabeth B.
May 21, 2024
676
Mrs. Martine p.
May 20, 2024
675
Mx. jo s.
May 20, 2024
674
Anonymous
May 20, 2024
673
Ms. Karen C.
May 20, 2024
672
Ms. Donna S.
May 20, 2024
671
Mr. frank s.
May 20, 2024
670
Mrs. Monica M.
May 20, 2024
669
Ms. Linda W.
May 20, 2024
668
Ms. Candace C.
May 20, 2024
667
Anonymous
May 20, 2024
666
Anonymous
May 20, 2024
665
Ms. Susan C.
May 20, 2024
664
Ms. Patricia D.
May 20, 2024
663
Ms. Audrey T.
May 20, 2024
662
Anonymous
May 20, 2024
661
Ms. Lillian M.
May 20, 2024
660
Ms. Allen C.
May 20, 2024
659
Mrs. Carol B.
May 20, 2024
658
Mr. Brian L.
May 20, 2024
657
Ms. Cynthia L.
May 20, 2024
656
Ms. Debra P.
May 20, 2024
655
Anonymous
May 20, 2024
654
Mr. A J C.
May 20, 2024
653
Mrs. Dulcie C.
May 20, 2024
652
Mr. Marcello E.
May 20, 2024
651
Ms. Melanie R.
May 20, 2024
650
Anonymous
May 20, 2024
649
Mr. Mark T.
May 20, 2024
648
Ms. Jocelyn M.
May 20, 2024
647
Anonymous
May 20, 2024

Stop 2022 IHR Amendments For Violating The Rules!

Use your voice to speak up and say no more UN and WHO funding for unproven agendas and monopolistic strategies and One Health concepts.

On May 27, 2022, Committee A of the World Health Assembly “purportedly adopted” the amendments to the International Health Regulations.

The Secret IHR meetings that happened in 2022 need to become transparent. We’re DEMANDING the HHS and World Health Organization answer the questions.

We have also presented a freedom of information request along with other legal processes started.

About This Initiative: We aim to Sue & Exit the WHO

Legal Action Is Needed & QUICK!

It’s time to sue the World Health Abomination for authorizing experimental products that are not vaccines on the global market, for censorship, persecution, fraudulent climate, pandemic and vaccine scientific recommendations, and we can never forget it was the WHO that is responsible for issuing a declaration of emergency not in good faith, which violates international law.  That declaration caused illegal limits to our rights, and their powers in the future must be curtailed by changing policy.

Take Serious Action To EXIT the WHO

Global EXIT the WHO Initiative

Global problems require global solutions. Join forces with us as we take serious legal action to prevent the adoption of unethical and unscientific WHO agendas in May 2024 WHA77.

You Need to Know Why To EXIT the WHO

Play Video

It is time to get strategic to defeat the WHO experimental vaccine, censorship & climate scam 2030 agendas before it is too late!

Edit Template

Thank you everyone who signed the letters below by the deadlines!
The governments have acknowledged receipt of our letters.
The current demand is above.
Please sign ABOVE!

Say It Loud! Say No.

Remind WHO WGIHR Meeting Feb 5-9, 2024: DO NOT VIOLATE IHR! NO IHR Amendments Allowed!!!

Use your voice to speak up and say no more UN and WHO funding for unproven agendas and monopolistic strategies and One Health concepts.

Dear DG Tedros, Loyce Pace, Colin Mciff, WHO ethics office, WHO Health and Multilateral, Executive Board, et al.

The WGIHR is continuing to meet in order to propose IHR amendments at the WHA77 despite the DG Tedros having failed to “communicate” the package of amendments within the 4 month deadline to be compliant with IHR art. 55.

Remind WHO WGIHR Meeting Feb 5-9, 2024: DO NOT VIOLATE IHR! NO IHR Amendments Allowed!!!

Dear WGIHR et al

You can add formatting using markdown syntax - read more
433 signatures

Share this with your friends:

Say It Loud! Say No.

Enforce Article 55 – Prevent Late IHR Amendments

Use your voice to speak up and say no more UN and WHO funding for unproven agendas and monopolistic strategies and One Health concepts.

January the 27th, 2024, was the deadline for the director general of the World Health Organization Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to communicate to you and every other member Nation a package of amendments to be considered at the 77th World Health Assembly.

Since the WHO DG failed to communicate a package of amendments in alignment with Article 55

We demand to halt any further approvals of any late IHR amendments which would be in violation of article 55.

Enforce Article 55 – Prevent Late IHR Amendments

Enforce Article 55 – Prevent Late IHR Amendments

You can add formatting using markdown syntax - read more
1,078 signatures

Share this with your friends:

Say It Loud! Say No.

Written Comment Re: Implications of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Commitments/Regimes and Other Proposed Commitments in the WHO Pandemic Agreement

Use your voice to speak up and say no more UN and WHO funding for unproven agendas and monopolistic strategies and One Health concepts.

Use your voice to speak up and say no more UN and WHO funding for unproven agendas and monopolistic strategies and One Health concepts.

The WHO has proffered many concepts and strategies for managing global health, almost all are scientifically unsound and cause more harm than good. We protest all potential vehicles and means for implementation of commitments to which the U.S. may subscribe. All involve the centralization of data in WHO as well as the way to hold States accountable. Its a globalist dream and a nation states nightmare.

There are serious issues of WHO serious breaches of international obligations and unanswered criminal charges in WHO ethics department that we keep raising to HHS OGA which so far are not addressed. The issues in our particular case of a 2 year record of WHO malfeasance needs to be recognized and addressed because it is cause to force US top EXIT the WHO, not further fund and get in bed with the corrupt, decrepit and failing WHO.

Written Comment Re: Implications of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Commitments/Regimes and Other Proposed Commitments in the WHO Pandemic Agreement

Greetings

You can add formatting using markdown syntax - read more
889 signatures

Share this with your friends: