First Issue: Motion for Advisory Opinion from HHS OGA Legal Council and OIG:

URGENT request for response prior to WHA77.

Dear Legal Advisor,

On May 27, 2022, Committee A of the World Health Assembly “purportedly adopted” the amendments to the International Health Regulations.

CLICK HERE to watch the “purported adoption” of the amendments

It is our understanding through watching the video, that the meeting was very sparsely attended. As you know, Rule 85 (page 194 of the Basic Documents) clearly states that a majority of the members of the Committee are required to be present for a question to be put to a vote.

Due to the seeming lack of attendance when the vote was confirmed, and due to the fact there does not seem to be any record of attendance being taken just prior to the “purported adoption” of the amendments by Committee A on May 27, 2022, we are acting prudently and hereby assert our right to require proof from the Member States and WHO that the President of Committee A of the World Health Assembly has actually complied with Rule 85.

That request for proof was sent to The WHO:

Since the attendance by a majority of the members of Committee A was not confirmed, it seems the question regarding the proposed amendments could not be put to a valid vote within the guidelines detailed in Rule 85.

Question: Are the IHR Amendments adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022, valid and in compliance with every single rule that applies?

Question: If not, what is the proper remedy to suspend and annul the void act of the IHR Amendments adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022, in excess of the rules of procedure?

Question: If the IHR Amendment\'s adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022 were void ab initio, is there a violation of WHO Rules and if so, precisely which rules, who violated those rules, are there penalties that apply to the           violators, or is there any responsibility of cessation and reparations by WHO or MS to those parties who had to legally act to prove the void nature of the IHR Amendment\'s adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022?  Second set of Issues: After Committee A approved the amendments on May 27, 2022, it seems that during the Eighth Plenary meeting the next day, the members of the World Health Assembly COMPLETELY FAILED TO CONDUCT ANY VOTE AT ALL regarding the amendments to the International Health Regulations.

As far as we are aware it appears the following document was never voted on at all during the Eighth Plenary Session of he 75th World Health Assembly: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_R12-en.pdf

A review of the eighth Plenary session in the video record of the events of 28 May 2022 appears to show that NO OFFICIAL VOTE ON THIS MATTER WAS CONDUCTED AT ALL.

Question: Did the vote May 28, 2022 conform to the procedural rules as set forth in Rule 73, \"The Health Assembly shall normally vote by show of hands...\"?

Question: If not, what is the proper remedy to suspend and annul the void act of the IHR Amendments adopted by Committee A on May 27, 2022, in excess of the rules of procedure, that were never fully voted upon as reqiured under Article 73?

Question: Did WHO violate their own rules by allowing new amendments to be submitted after the Article 55 deadline of 4 months in advance of the 2022 World Health Assembly?  https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_ACONF7-en.pdf

Question: Did WHO also violate their own rules by improperly \"voting\" on the amendments in Committee A on May 27, 2022 without a majority of members in attendance and without a show of hands. If so, Did WHO commit voting fraud in regards to the 2022 amendments? If so, what is the remedy?

Question: Did WHO violate their own rules by completely failing to vote on the amendments at all during the 8th Plenary session? https://www.who.int/about/accountability/governance/world-health-assembly/seventy-fifth-world-health-assembly

Question: Did WHO\'s LEGAL COUNSEL Derek Walton misrepresent this document as a \"CERTIFIED TRUE COPY\", despite the reality of no vote by the rules?https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_R12-en.pdf

Question: Was the submission of the above document on May 24, 2022 illegitimate, because it is a new amendment that is NOT technical in nature? see: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_ACONF7-en.pdf  It seems the 2022 amendment to Article 62 CREATED A NEW AUTHORITY for member nations to submit a reservation to an amendment, is this correct? If so, is this a NEW AUTHORITY that did not exist in the 2005 version of the IHR and is it legitimate or absolutely null and void?

Our premise, presumptions and assumptions - why we need to get to the truth about WHO:

The WHO violated their own rules by allowing new amendments to be submitted after the Article 55 deadline of 4 months in advance of the 2022 World Health Assembly.  https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_ACONF7-en.pdf

The WHO doubly violated their own rules by improperly \"voting\" on the amendments in Committee A on May 27, 2022 without a majority of members in attendance and without a show of hands. The WHO has clearly committed voting fraud in regards to the 2022 amendments.

The WHO violated their own rules by completely failing to vote on the amendments at all during the 8th Plenary session. https://www.who.int/about/accountability/governance/world-health-assembly/seventy-fifth-world-health-assembly

The WHO\'s LEGAL COUNSEL Derek Walton misrepresented this document as a \"CERTIFIED TRUE COPY\" https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_R12-en.pdf

The WGIHR is openly plotting to again violate the Article 55 requirement to submit amendments 4 months in advance of the 77th World Health Assembly.

Please Answer point by Point in chronological order

%%your signature%%